Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/777/2026 of MANOHAR SAHU Vs JAGANNATH SAHU on 24 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41701-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 777 of 2026 1 - Manohar Sahu S/o Late Shri Narottam Lal Sahu Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Shanti Nagar Kumhari, Tehsil And District- Durg, (C.G.) 2 - Fingeshwar Sahu S/o Late Shri Narottam Lal Sahu Aged About
CGHC010309232026
2026:CGHC:41701-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 777 of 2026
1 - Manohar Sahu S/o Late Shri Narottam Lal Sahu Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Shanti Nagar Kumhari, Tehsil And District- Durg, (C.G.)
2 - Fingeshwar Sahu S/o Late Shri Narottam Lal Sahu Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Shanti Nagar Kumhari, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.)
3 - Nandkumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Narottam Lal Sahu Aged About 47 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Shanti Nagar Kumhari, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Jagannath Sahu S/o Late Shri Sukhiram Sahu Aged About 54 Years R/o Ward No. 23, Janjgiri Indranagar, Tehsil-Dhamdha, District- Durg (C.G.)
2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Registrar / Lok Nyas S D M (Revenue), Through District Collector, Durg (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioners
:
Mr. Amit Nayak, Advocate
For Respondent No./State :
Mr. Anand Gupta, Dy. G.A.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput, Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard on I.A. No.1/2026, an application for condonation of delay in filing the instant MCC.
2. On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 60 days in filing the MCC is hereby condoned.
3. This MCC has been filed for restoration of F.A. No. 260/2025 which was dismissed on account of peremptory order passed by this Court on 08.04.2026.
4. The present application is not opposed by learned counsel for the State.
5. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, it is allowed and F.A. No.260/2025 is directed to be restored to its original number.
6. Accordingly, the present MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Judge Prakash