Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/1074/2023 of ARJUN KUMAR KEWAT Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41801 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1074 of 2023 1 - Arjun Kumar Kewat S/o Shri Ram Lal Kewat Aged About 33 Years R/o Village- Khaparidih, Thana - Giodhouri (Tundra), Tahsil Kasdol, District - Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 -
CGHC010070082023
2026:CGHC:41801
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 1074 of 2023
1 - Arjun Kumar Kewat S/o Shri Ram Lal Kewat Aged About 33 Years R/o Village- Khaparidih, Thana - Giodhouri (Tundra), Tahsil Kasdol, District - Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner
Versus
1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department of Food Civil Supply And Consumer Protection, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2 - Collector Balodabazar, District - Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kasdol, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
4 - Food Officer (Food-Inspector) Kasdol, Thana And Tahsil - Kasdol, District - Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
5 - Maa Pahandai Khadya Suraksha Poshan Evam Upbhokta Sewa Sahakari Samiti Pahanda, Through - Its President Sardish Patel R/o Village Pahanda, Gram Panchayat Khaparidih Thana- Giodhouri (Tundra), Tahsil Kasdol, District - Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
(Cause title is downloaded from CIS Periphery.)
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Rajendra Patel, Counsel appears on behalf of Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate.
For State
:
Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, P.L.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the grievance has been redressed, therefore, the same may be disposed of as having become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents has no objection to the said prayer.
3. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge U.K. Raju