Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/2516/2026 of GITESH PATRO Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41819 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2516 of 2026 1 - Gitesh Patro S/o Suresh Patro Aged About 25 Years R/o Mahatma Gandhi Ward, Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Station House Officer, Police
CGHC010374642026
2026:CGHC:41819
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2516 of 2026
1 - Gitesh Patro S/o Suresh Patro Aged About 25 Years R/o Mahatma Gandhi Ward, Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.
--- Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Station House Officer, Police Station- Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.
--- Respondent
(Cause title is taken from CIS system)
For Petitioner
:
None present
For State
:
Mr. Ramnarayan Sahu, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board
25/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This office reference is registered on the PUD forwarded by Special Judge, NDPS Act, Saraipali, District – Mahasamund requesting for further two months time to conclude the trial as directed by the Court in M.Cr.C. No.5473 of 2024, whereby six months time was granted. Learned trial Court could not conclude the trial within the period as directed has forwarded letter requesting for extension of time, accordingly on 30.04.2025 five months time was granted in Cr.M.P. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN
No. 1444 of 2025, and lastly the time was extended for further period of four months on 06.11.2025 in Cr.M.P. No. 3329 of 2025.
2. In the request letter, trial Court has mentioned that trial could not be concluded because prosecution witnesses are not appearing before the Court and against them arrest warrant has been issued.
3. In view of the aforementioned facts of the case and the reasons assigned in the request letter, further two months time from today is granted to conclude the trial as directed by this Court in M.Cr.C. No.5473 of 2024.
4. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and directions.
5. Registry is directed to send copy of this order to the concerned trial Court for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram