Armed Forces Tribunal
Ris Dasharatha Padhy (Army) vs UOI & Others on 8 July 2026
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR
2.
OA 89/2016
JC-797560ARis DasharathaPadhy
…. Applicant
Versus
UOI & Others
…. Respondents
For Applicant
: None
For Respondents
: Mr. Pyare Lal, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
08.07.2026
1. We have heard the counsels for the parties and perused the material on record.
2. It isevident from record that with the passing away of designated Counsel for the Applicant, it was deemed appropriate to issue Notice to the Applicant in this matter for his personal appearance or through a designated counsel for pursuing the matter, if so desired. Despite repeat Notices dated 25/2/2026 and 27/5/2026 having been served upon the applicant as has been confirmed by the Postal Department, none appears on behalf of the applicant before this Bench, today.
3. In view of the foregoing and since adequate opportunity has been afforded to the applicant to pursue his matter either personally or through a designated counsel, by way of issuing Notice to him, non appearance in this matter either by the applicant or through a designated counsel clearly shows that applicant is not desirous of pursuing this Application.
2
4. The OA is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to record.
(SANJIV MITTAL)
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
cda/-