Chhattisgarh High Court

WPC/4887/2026 of ANKIT MISHRA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:41649 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4887 of 2026 Ankit Mishra S/o Late Shri Ashok Mishra Aged About 34 Years R/o Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary,

CGHC010370202026

2026:CGHC:41649

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 4887 of 2026

Ankit Mishra S/o Late Shri Ashok Mishra Aged About 34 Years R/o Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Additional Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Amita Devi W/o Shri Laxmikant Dwivedi R/o Kapil Nagar, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Manki Devi W/o Shri Laxminarayan Sahu R/o Geetanjali City, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 7 - Mahadev Bhattacharya S/o Shri Satyanarayan Bhattacharya R/o Vaishali Nagar, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

8 - Mukesh Singh Chandel S/o Shri Indranarayan Chandel R/o Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Nishikant Sinha, Advocate

For Respondent(s) :

Mr. Priyank Rathi, G.A.

Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25/09/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for the following reliefs: 10.1 Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the impugned order dated 31.08.2026 (Annexure P/1) passed by Respondent no. 4/Tahsildar, Bilaspur in Revenue Case No. 202608072500047/A- 70/2025-26, alongwith the consequential eviction warrant/order. 10.2 Direct the respondents to maintain the petitioner’s possession over land bearing Khasra No 232/26, admeasuring 0.80 acre, Village Chilhati, P.H. No. 29, Tahsil and District- Bilaspur, and restrain them from dispossessing or interfering with the petitioner’s possession pursuant to the impugned order. 10.3 In the alternative, direct the competent revenue authority to conduct a fresh and lawful joint demarcation of Khasra No.

232/26 alongwith the adjoining lands, strictly in accordance with the order dated 19.05.2025 passed by the Additional Collector, Bilaspur and the order dated 30.01.2026 passed by this Hon’ble Court in WPC No. 346 of 2026, after due notice and opportunity to all concerned landholders. 10.4 Pass any other order deemed fit, in the interest of justice.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is filed against the order dated 31.08.2026 passed by the learned Tahsildar, Bilaspur in Revenue Case No. 202608072500047/A- 70/2025-26, whereby the application preferred by Respondent No. 5 to 8 under Section 250 of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 has been allowed and the petitioner has been directed to vacate the portions of land allegedly belonging to the private respondents, with a consequential direction for issuance of an eviction warrant.

3. Learned State counsel submits that there is an alternate remedy of appeal available to the petitioner.

4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to prefer an appeal before the SDO, Bilaspur, within a period of 10 days and to file an appropriate application under Section 52 of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959, within a further period of 15 days.

6. It is further directed that the respondent authorities shall not take any coercive steps against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned order dated 31.08.2026 for a period of 30 days. SD/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)

JUDGE Madhurima

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead