Chhattisgarh High Court
REVP/252/2026 of M/s SAHIL ENTERPRISES Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41641-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 252 of 2026 1 - M/s Sahil Enterprises R/o Valmiki Chowk, Near Gupta Plastic Sanichi Padav Gondpara Chhattisgarh, Through Its Proprietor Shri Sahil Gupta ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The
CGHC010311402026
2026:CGHC:41641-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
REVP No. 252 of 2026
1 - M/s Sahil Enterprises R/o Valmiki Chowk, Near Gupta Plastic Sanichi Padav Gondpara Chhattisgarh, Through Its Proprietor Shri Sahil Gupta
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Conservator Of Forest Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Divisional Forest Officer District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector (Mining Branch) District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh 5 - Mining Officer Office Of The Collector (Mining Branch), District Gaurela-Pendra- Marwahi Chhattisgarh 6 - Director Mining Department Indrawati Bhawan Block D, Second Floor, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
(Cause-title, as taken from CIS System)
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Senior Advocate
assisted by Mr. Udit Khatri, Advocate
For State/Respondent(s)
:
Mr. DR Minj, Dy. Advocate General.
Hon'ble Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, Judge Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board 25/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. This review petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking review of the order dated 08.07.2026 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WPC No.3517/2026.
3. After arguing for some time, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present review petition.
4. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. Permission is granted.
6. Accordingly, the present review petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
7. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
Sd/- Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Judge
Rukhsar