Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/8957/2026 of SURESH VERMA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 23 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41581 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 8957 of 2026 1 - Suresh Verma S/o Matu Verma Aged About 27 Years R/o Infront Of Kayaghat Muktidham, Ward No. 29, Police Station Jhutmil, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Applicant Versus 1 - State Of
CGHC010369862026
2026:CGHC:41581
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 8957 of 2026
1 - Suresh Verma S/o Matu Verma Aged About 27 Years R/o Infront Of Kayaghat Muktidham, Ward No. 29, Police Station Jhutmil, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
... Applicant
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Jhutmil, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
... Non-applicant
For Applicant
:
Mr. N.K. Chatterjee, Advocate
For Non-applicant
:
Mr. Aman Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
24/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is the third bail application filed by the applicant under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 66/2026 registered at Police Station – Jutmill, District – Raigarh, Chhattisgarh for the offences punishable under Sections 123, 275, 286 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Section 77 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
2. Learned counsel for the Non-Applicant/State submits that criminal antecedents of the applicant has not been disclosed in the application and he has only mentioned 02 out of 03 criminal antecedents.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application at this stage with liberty to file better constituted application.
4. In view of the submissions made by the counsel for parties, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY