Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4879/2026 of KUSUM PATEL Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 23 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41591 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4879 of 2026 1 - Kusum Patel D/o Panchram Patel, Aged About 41 Years R/o Marar Gali, Talapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Distt Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department
CGHC010369762026
2026:CGHC:41591
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4879 of 2026
1 - Kusum Patel D/o Panchram Patel, Aged About 41 Years R/o Marar Gali, Talapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Distt Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Distt - Raipur (C.G.)
-
Collector,
Bilaspur,
District
-
Bilaspur
(C.G.)
3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bilaspur, Distt- Bilaspur (C.G.)
Tahsildar, Bilaspur, Tahsil - Bilaspur Distt -Bilaspur (C.G.)
Nayab Tahsildar, Bilaspur, Distt - Bilaspur (C.G.)
6 - Manish Shukla, Revenue Inspector, Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
7 - Nandini Shandilya W/o Jawaharlal Shandilya R/o Jarahabhata, Sai Mandir Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Armaan Memon appears on behalf of Mr.
Syed Majid Ali, Advocate
For Respondent /State
: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A.
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/09/2026
RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally signed by
RUCHI YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, commanding the respondent authorities specifically Respondent No.6 to execute the final order dated 06.05.2026 (Annexure P-1) in Revenue case no. 107/A- 12/2024-25 passed by the Additional Collector Bilaspur and conduct the physical demarcation of Petitioner's land within a stipulated time-bound period. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may issue an appropriate writ or direction to the Collector, Bilaspur to initiate immediate departmental enquiry and disciplinary proceedings against the erring Revenue Inspector (Circle Juna Bilaspur) for gross insubordination, dereliction of statutory duty, and disobedience of superior orders dated 02.07.2026 and 20.08.2026. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court Pass any other order(s) or relief(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the order dated 06.05.2026 passed by the Additional Collector, Bilaspur, whereby a direction was issued for demarcation of the land in question after following due process of law, the authorities have not carried out the demarcation. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present petition.
3. Learned State counsel submits that respondent No.7 has preferred a revision against the order dated 06.05.2026 before the concerned Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, which is pending for adjudication. Therefore, the demarcation proceedings could not be undertaken.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the fact that a revision against the order dated 06.05.2026 is stated to be pending before the concerned Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, the petitioner is directed to approach the concerned authority where the demarcation proceedings are pending, and in which he has also been impleaded as a party and pursue the matter in accordance with law.
6. In case the revision preferred by respondent No.7 is pending before the concerned Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, the concerned Commissioner is directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. The State is directed to communicate this order to the concerned officer for necessary compliance.
8. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi