Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/786/2021 of RAJENDRA KUMAR BARLE Vs UNION OF INDIA on 23 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41522 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 786 of 2021 • Rajendra Kumar Barle S/o Bhagirathi Barle Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Parsathi Tehsil Abhanpur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of
CGHC010017092021
2026:CGHC:41522
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 786 of 2021
•
Rajendra Kumar Barle S/o Bhagirathi Barle Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Parsathi Tehsil Abhanpur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner
versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Road, New Delhi, District New Delhi.
2. Project Director National Highway Authority Of India (NHAI) Project Implementation Unit Anupam Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
4. Collector Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
5. Sub Divisional Officer-Cum-Competent Authority Land Acquisition Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
6. Inspector General Registration And Superintendent Of Stamp GST Bhawan Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kamal Kishore Patel, Advocate. For Respondent/NHAI : Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate. For Respondent /State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/09/2026
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10:1. That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to pass similar order in terms of WA No. 7/2019 10.2 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has already filed an application under Section 3-G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, which is pending for consideration. Accordingly, he is not pressing the present petition and submits that he will pursue the said application pending before the Commissioner-cum-Arbitrator, Raipur Division.
3. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Chandrakant