Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4490/2023 of AMIT GUPTA Vs CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED on 23 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41611 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4490 of 2023 1 - Amit Gupta S/o Late Dwarika Prasad Gutpa, Aged About 37 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, R-2 L-1, Street No. 5, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Yogendra Banjare S/o Yuvraj Dutt Banjare, Aged About
CGHC010339182023
2026:CGHC:41611
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4490 of 2023
1 - Amit Gupta S/o Late Dwarika Prasad Gutpa, Aged About 37 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, R-2 L-1, Street No. 5, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
2 - Yogendra Banjare S/o Yuvraj Dutt Banjare, Aged About 31 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, Street No. 5, Bilaspur Tahsil Sakri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Through Its Managing Director, Dagania, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2 - The Executive Engineer (City), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur City Division No. 2 (West), District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
The Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
4 - The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District :
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh
5 - Anil Kumar Didhraskar, S/o Shri Krishna Rao Dighraskar, Aged About 72 Years R/o 102/11 Every Shine Beverly Park, Near Mayor Buyngalow, Meera Road, Thana (Maharashtra)
6 - Bhaskar Yadva R/o Ganesh Chowk, Near Mungeli Naka, Bilaspur District Bilapur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Pranay Gupta, Advocate
For Respondent No.
1 & 2
For State
:
:
Ms. Shrejal Gupta on behalf of Ms. Astha Shukla, Advocate Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Panel Lawyer
Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
24/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has lost contact with the petitioner and, therefore, has no instructions to prosecute the present petition.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed for want of instructions. SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Madhurima