Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4632/2026 of MANHARAN YADAV Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 23 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41613 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4632 of 2026 1 - Manharan Yadav Son Of Sadhuram Aged About 63 Years, 2 - Balaram Mahra Son Of Manbhulwa Aged About 55 Yearsm, 3 - Chhahoran Yadav Son Of Surujbali Aged About 54 Years, 4 - Sunil Kumar Kurre Son Of Girdhan
CGHC010345682026
2026:CGHC:41613
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4632 of 2026
Manharan Yadav Son Of Sadhuram Aged About 63 Years,
Balaram Mahra Son Of Manbhulwa Aged About 55 Yearsm,
Chhahoran Yadav Son Of Surujbali Aged About 54 Years,
Sunil Kumar Kurre Son Of Girdhan Aged About 43 Years,
Chhahoran Vastrakar Son Of Manbhulwa Aged About 52 Years,
Rajendra Kumar Banjare Son Of Sukrit Aged About 32 Years,
Bhagwat Mahra Son Of Manbhulwa Aged About 56 Years, All Are Resident Of Village Paraghat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur
(C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).
The Tahsildar Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Somnath Verma, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Vivek Kumar Verma, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble
Mr.
Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
24/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:- “10:1. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order, direction and direct the respondent No. 2(Tahsildar) to comply the order dated 30.01.2025 of the Hon'ble High Court in WPC No. 1976/2019. Further, may kindly direct the authorities to register the case and inquire according to the Act and Rule and pass order on applications. 10:2. That, the Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to pass any order, direction issuance of bhoomiswami right. 10:3. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief as it may deem fit and appropriate.”
2. Learned Counsel for the State submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. In view of the aforesaid submission nothing further remains to be considered in the present matter.
3. At this stage, learned Counsel for the Petitioner has no objection.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Chandrakant