Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/654/2023 of M/S P.S.A. CONSTRUCTION Vs UNION OF INDIA on 23 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41553 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 654 of 2023 M/s P.S.A. Construction A Duly Registered Partnership Firm Having Its Office At B-89, Near Jagannath Mandir, Gayatri Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through Its Partner Rahul Bansal, S/o Mohan Lal Bansal, Aged
CGHC010035302023
2026:CGHC:41553
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 654 of 2023
M/s P.S.A. Construction A Duly Registered Partnership Firm Having Its Office At B-89, Near Jagannath Mandir, Gayatri Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through Its Partner Rahul Bansal, S/o Mohan Lal Bansal, Aged About 24 Years.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Railways (Railway Board), Rail Bhawan, Raisina Road, New Delhi 110001.
2 - South East Central Railway Through The General Manager, New Zonal Building, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh -
495001.
3 - The Chief Engineer (Construction) South East Central Railway, New Zonal Building, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh -
495001.
4 - The Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction) South East Central Railway, New Zonal Building, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh - 495001.
5 - The Fa And Cao (Construction) South East Central Railway, New Zonal Building, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh - 495001.
---Respondents
(Cause title taken from CIS System)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Karthik Kathuria, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rishabh Garg, Advocate For Union of India : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSG
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24.09.2026
Digitally
signed by
AMIT
PATEL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant writ petition.
2. The prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL