Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4572/2026 of UPENDRA NATH CHANDRA (IN PERSON) Vs UNION OF INDIA on 23 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41479 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4572 of 2026 1 - Upendra Nath Chandra (In Person) Son Of Bhagwat Prasad Chandra, Aged About 38 Years Resident Of Village Kataud, P.S. Dabhra, District Sakti (C.G.) Mo. No. 9770778051. 2 - Sarita Chandra W/o Shri Upendra
CGHC010331832026
2026:CGHC:41479
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4572 of 2026
1 - Upendra Nath Chandra (In Person) Son Of Bhagwat Prasad Chandra, Aged About 38 Years Resident Of Village Kataud, P.S.
Dabhra, District Sakti (C.G.) Mo. No. 9770778051.
2 - Sarita Chandra W/o Shri Upendra Nath Chandra, Aged About 33
Years R/o Village Katoud, Post Kansa, P.S. Dabhra, District Sakti,
Chhattisgarh – 495688.
3 - Dhruvi Chandra Doughter Of Upendra Nath Chandra, Aged About 6
Years Resident Of Village Kataud, P.S. Dabhra, District Sakti (C.G.)
Miner Represented To Father Petition No.- 1 Upendra Nath Chandra.
4 - Chitra Chandra Doughter Of Upendra Nath Chandra, Aged About 4
Years Resident Of Village Kataud P.S. Dabhra, District Sakti (C.G.)
Miner Represented To Father Petition No.- 1 Upendra Nath Chandra.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, North Block, Cabinet Secretariat, Raisina Hill, New Delhi - 110001.
2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Digitally signed by AMIT
PATEL
Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur,
Chhattisgarh – 492002.
3 - Department Of Home Affairs, Through The Principal Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh – 492002.
4 - Ministry Of Cooperation, Through The Secretary, Government Of India, Atal Akshay Urja Bhawan, C G O Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110003.
5 - Central Registrar Of Cooperative Societies (C R C S), Through The Central Registrar, Department Of Agriculture And Farmers Welfare, Ministry Of Cooperation, World Trade Centre, Nauroji Nagar, New Delhi – 110029.
6 - Director General Of Police (D G P), State Of Chhattisgarh, Police Headquarters (P H Q), Sector 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur,
7 - Superintendent Of Police (S P), Office Of The Superintendent Of Police, District Sakti, Chhattisgarh – 495689.
8 - Station House Officer (S H O), Office Of The Station House Officer, Police Station Dabhra, District Sakti, Chhattisgarh – 495688.
9 - High Court Legal Services Committee (H C L S C), Through The Secretary, Chhattisgarh High Court Building Complex, Bodri, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh – 495220.
10 - Chhattisgarh State Legal Services Authority (C G S L S A), Through The Member Secretary, Old High Court Building, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh – 495001.
11 - National Legal Services Authority (N A L S A), Through The Member Secretary, Supreme Court Buildings Complex, Tilak Marg, New Delhi – 110001.
12 - National Human Rights Commission (N H R C), Through The Secretary, General, Manav Adhikar Bhawan, Block - C, G P O Complex, I N A, New Delhi – 110023, 13 - Esaf Swasraya Multi-State Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. Through Its Chairman, Head Officer Esaf Bhavan, Mannuthy P.O, Thrissur, Kerala – 680651.
14 - Microfinance Institutions Network (M F I N), Through Its Chief Executive Officer, 4th Floor, Polt No. 36, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana – 122002.
15 - Muthoot Finance Limited, Through Its Branch Manager, Balod Branch, District Balod, Chhattisgarh - 491226.
.... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS System)
For Petitioners
: Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate appears
through Legal Aid.
For State
: Mr. Priyank Rathi, GA
For Respondent Nos. 14
& 15
: Ms. Anmol Sharma, CGC
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners through Legal Aid, pursuant to the order dated 09.09.2026 passed by this Court, submits that upon perusal of the petition, it appears that the same has not been drafted in accordance with law and that the pleadings as well as the relief sought therein require appropriate rectification and proper formulation. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner-in-person through Legal Aid seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, duly constituted and in accordance with law.
2. Since the petitioner-in-person has been directed to avail the assistance of Legal Aid, the prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner-in-person appears to be fair and reasonable. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, duly constituted and in accordance with law. However, learned Advocate presently appointed to represent the petitioners through Legal Aid shall continue to represent the petitioners in the fresh petition to be filed.
SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL