Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4656/2022 of MUKESH KUMAR AGRAWAL Vs UNION OF INDIA on 22 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41404 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4656 of 2022 1 - Mukesh Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Suresh Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 47 Years Presently Resident Of Pine- 152, Parthivi Pacific, Behind Axis Bank, Tatibandh, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
CGHC010362932022
2026:CGHC:41404
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4656 of 2022
1 - Mukesh Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Suresh Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 47
Years Presently Resident Of Pine- 152, Parthivi Pacific, Behind Axis Bank, Tatibandh, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Union Of India Through The Ministry Of Home Affairs, South Block, New Delhi.
2 - Regional Passport Office, Raipur, 1st Floor, Commercial Complex, Sector- 4, Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyay Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
4 - The Station House Officer, Police Station Mowa, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally
signed by
RUCHI YADAV
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate
For Respondents No. 1
and 2/UOI
: Ms. Anchala Kujur appears on behalf of Mr.
Ramakant Mishra, DSGI
For Respondents No. 3
and 4/State
: Dr. Arham Siddiqui, P.L.
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 23/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail proper recourse to law.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that they have no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty as prayed for.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi