Chhattisgarh High Court

WPC/4823/2026 of BHAGWAT SATNAMI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:41400 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4823 of 2026 1 - Bhagwat Satnami S/o Late Chuvari Satnami, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Mohdi, Tahsil Sargaon, Distt. Mungeli (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat

CGHC010371222026

2026:CGHC:41400

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 4823 of 2026

1 - Bhagwat Satnami S/o Late Chuvari Satnami, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Mohdi, Tahsil Sargaon, Distt. Mungeli (C.G.).

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur

(C.G.)

-

Collector,

Mungeli

Distt.

Mungeli

(C.G.)

3 - The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Mungeli Distt. Mungeli

(C.G.)

4 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Patharia Mungeli Distt.

Mungeli

(C.G.)

5 - Smt. Anchal Satnami, Sarpanch Village Panchayat Mohdi Tahsil Patharia Mungeli Distt. Mungeli (C.G.)

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Yogesh Chandra, Advocate.

For Respondent(s)/State :

Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Panel

Lawyer.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 23/09/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or to issue appropriate direction, directing the respondent no. 03 to take decision upon the complaint made by the petitioner on 16.01.2026 within stipulated time as this Hon'ble Court deems fit looking to the facts and circumstances of the case. 10.2 That, any other relief which the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper as per the nature of the case. An affidavit in support of this writ petition is filed herewith.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate application before the concerned authorities.

3. No objection has been raised from other side.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

Raghu Jat

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead