Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRCA/1537/2026 of DEEPAK YADAV @ DEEPAK Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 22 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41423 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1537 of 2026 1 - Deepak Yadav @ Deepak S/o Smt. Pramila Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Tangarmahri, Tahsil And P.S. Balrampur, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 2 - Shrawan Yadav S/o Radha Kishun Yadav Aged About
CGHC010362732026
2026:CGHC:41423
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 1537 of 2026
1 - Deepak Yadav @ Deepak S/o Smt. Pramila Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Tangarmahri, Tahsil And P.S. Balrampur, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.)
2 - Shrawan Yadav S/o Radha Kishun Yadav Aged About 34 Years R/o House No. 3
K.H, Village- Putsu, P.S.- Jhalriya District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.)
3 - Surya Yadav @ Surya Prakash Yadav S/o Shri Ajay Aged About 20 Years R/o Indra Gandhi Ward, Village/ City Balrampur, P.S- Balrampur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.)
... Applicants
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station- Pasta, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.)
... Non-applicant
For Applicants
:
Mr. Akath Kumar Yadav, Advocate
For Non-applicant
:
Mr. Himanshu Yadu, Panel Lawyer
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
23/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is the first anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail, as the applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 0044/2026 registered at Police Station – Pasta, District –
Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh for the offences punishable under Section 221, 3(5), 308(2), 351(2) and 356(3) of the B.N.S., 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondent/State submits that all the criminal antecedent of the Applicant No. 2 is not disclosed in the application.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this application at this stage with liberty to file better constitutied application.
4. In view of the submissions made by the counsel for parties, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY