Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4518/2022 of AJAY AGRAWAL Vs INDIAN OIL CORPORATION on 22 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41403 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4518 of 2022 1 - Ajay Agrawal S/o Late Laxmi Narayan Agrawal Aged About 61 Years R/o Behind Anupam Plaza, Station Road Chama, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Indian Oil Corporation
CGHC010344972022
2026:CGHC:41403
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4518 of 2022
1 - Ajay Agrawal S/o Late Laxmi Narayan Agrawal Aged About 61 Years R/o Behind Anupam Plaza, Station Road Chama, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Indian Oil Corporation Through- Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Registered Office Indian Oil Bhavan, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra (East)
Mumbai (Maharashtra)
Central Information Commisioner Through Chief Information Commissioner, Registered Office Baba Gang Nath Marg, Munirka, New Delhi 110067
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Sahil Sahu, Advocate
For Respondents
: Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 23/09/2026
RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally
signed by
RUCHI YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of MANDAMUS directing the respondent authorities to expedite the proceeding pending before respondent No. 2 and complete the proceeding within stipulated time period given under the law providing all the information sought by the petitioner under his Right to Information Act application. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue any writ or direction or order as deem feet in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the subsequent developments, the instant petition has become infructuous and, therefore, he does not want to press the same.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that he has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission, the instant petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi