Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4834/2026 of SHASTRI BAZAR THOK MACHHALI VIKRETA SANGH, BAIJNATHPARA, Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 22 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41310 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4834 of 2026 1 - Shastri Bazar Thok Machhali Vikreta Sangh, Baijnathpara, Raipur C.G. Through F.R. Khan, S/o K.R. Khan, R/o H. No. 37/403, Ward No. 89, Baijnathpara, Raipur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of
CGHC010366962026
2026:CGHC:41310
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4834 of 2026
1 - Shastri Bazar Thok Machhali Vikreta Sangh, Baijnathpara, Raipur C.G.
Through F.R. Khan, S/o K.R. Khan, R/o H. No. 37/403, Ward No. 89, Baijnathpara, Raipur C.G.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Ministry Of Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capitol Complex, Nawa Raipur, Raipur C.G.
2 - Collector Raipur, Dist. Raipur C.G.
3 - Municipal Corporation Raipur Through Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)
4 - The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Raipur, Raipur, Dist. Raipur
C.G.
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Raza Ali, Advocate
For Respondents No. 1
and 2
: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A.
For Respondents No. 3
and 4
: Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate
RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally
signed by
RUCHI YADAV
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 23/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that they have no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty as prayed for.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi