Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3750/2022 of AMRIT DAS Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 22 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41401 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3750 of 2022 1 - Amrit Das S/o Santosh Das Aged About 33 Years Working As Village Kotwar Singhitarai, R/o Village And Post - Singhitarai, P.S And Tehsil Dabhra, Revenue And Civil District Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh
CGHC010279772022
2026:CGHC:41401
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3750 of 2022
1 - Amrit Das S/o Santosh Das Aged About 33 Years Working As Village Kotwar Singhitarai, R/o Village And Post - Singhitarai, P.S And Tehsil Dabhra, Revenue And Civil District Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Revenue And Civil District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Janjgir - Champa, Revenue And Civil District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub - Divisional Officer ( Revenue) , Dabhra, Revenue And Civil District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Dabhar Tehsil - Dabhra, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh 5 - General Manager District Industry Centre, Janjgir - Champa, Revenue And Civil District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Shristi Sahu, Advocate on behalf
of Ms. Deepali Sahu, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)/State :
Ms. Akanksha Verma, Panel Lawyer.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RAGHVENDRA
JAT
Digitally
signed by
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
23/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue suitable writ (S), order (S), direction (S) by commanding the respondent authorities to provide the lands as mentioned in the order dated 23.03.2015 (Annexure P/1) with specification and identification within a time frame, say as for a period of 2 months and in alternative, if the above lands (as mentioned in the order dated 23.03.2015) is allotted/acquired then suitable compensation may kindly be paid to the petitioner within a specified period. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue suitable writ (S), order (S), direction (S) by commanding the respondent authorities to decide the representations (Annexure P-8) within time frame. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records from the respondent authorities for its kind perusal. 10.4 Any other relief, which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but is seeking a direction from this Court to the respondents, to decide the representations dated 24.11.2018 passed by the Collector and 26.11.2018 passed by the SDO (R ) and Tahsildar within a time frame fixed by this Court.
3. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the pending representation, he is having no objection to the limited prayer. His pending representation will be considered in accordance with law.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the concerned respondents No. 2 to 4 to consider/decide the representations of the petitioner dated 24.11.2018
and
26.11.2018
in
accordance
with law/rules/regulations and in an objective manner as expeditiously as possible within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case and the concerned Court is at liberty to pass appropriate order while considering the order passed by Full Bench of this Court in WPC No. 1571/2020, by which the entitlement of Kotwar in respect of service land has been decided.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat