Chhattisgarh High Court
FA/393/2016 of Suresh Kothari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 September 2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 393 of 2016 1 - Suresh Kothari S/o Aaskaran Kothari, Aged About 54 Years Occupation Business, R/o Sadar Bazar, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh .................Plaintiff, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant Versus 1 - State Of
CGHC010144552016
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA No. 393 of 2016
1 - Suresh Kothari S/o Aaskaran Kothari, Aged About 54 Years Occupation Business, R/o Sadar Bazar, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh .................Plaintiff, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector/ Ex Officio Secretary, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Sangita Tandon (Died) Through Lrs As Per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 12.11.2025
2.1 - Praveen Tandon S/o Late Shri K.C. Tandon Aged About 53 Years R/o House No.- 6/1 Nehru Nagar (East) Opposite Lokmanya Tilak Garden, Bhilai, District - Durg (C.G.)
2.2 - Bhavika Tandon D/o Praveen Tandon Aged About 23 Years R/o House No.- 6/1 Nehru Nagar (East) Opposite Lokmanya Tilak Garden, Bhilai, District - Durg (C.G.)
2.3 - Yash Tandon S/o Praveen Tandon Aged About 20 Years R/o House No.- 6/1 Nehru Nagar (East) Opposite Lokmanya Tilak Garden, Bhilai, District - Durg (C.G.)
... Respondents
[Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :
None in two rounds.
For Respondent
:
None in two rounds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Division Bench Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sushma Sawant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
on Board
(22.09.2026)
1. None appeared on behalf of the parties when the matter was SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN
taken up today even in the second round. Therefore, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
2. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu)
(Sushma Sawant) Judge Judge s@if