Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4634/2023 of LUCKY ENTERPRISES Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 21 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41236 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4634 of 2023 1 - Lucky Enterprises Through Proprietor Shri Haji Dilawar Dalla, Age About 66 Years, S/o Haji Yunus Dalla, Resident - Village Basna, Beside Canara Bank, Ward No.5 District Mahasamund (C.G.) Pincode 493554.
CGHC010352712023
2026:CGHC:41236
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4634 of 2023
1 - Lucky Enterprises Through Proprietor Shri Haji Dilawar Dalla, Age About 66 Years, S/o Haji Yunus Dalla, Resident - Village Basna, Beside Canara Bank, Ward No.5 District Mahasamund (C.G.) Pincode 493554.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department Mantralaya At Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department Block 2, 3rd Floor Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District :
Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3 - The Collector Of C.G. State (Food Department) Mahasamund, District :
Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Shashank Agrawal appears on behalf of Mr. Sudhir Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A.
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally
signed by
RUCHI
YADAV
22/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the present petition any further and, therefore, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the same.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi