Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4795/2026 of SAMEET TANDON Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 21 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41120 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4795 of 2026 1 - Sameet Tandon S/o Late Sukh Das Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Bharatpur Post Nipania Tehsil Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara C. G. 2 - Sandeep Tandon S/i Late Sukh Das Aged About 27 Years R/o
CGHC010363092026
2026:CGHC:41120
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4795 of 2026
1 - Sameet Tandon S/o Late Sukh Das Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Bharatpur Post Nipania Tehsil Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara C. G.
2 - Sandeep Tandon S/i Late Sukh Das Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Bharatpur, Post Nipania, Tehsil Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara C. G.
3 - Amit Tandon S/o Late Sukh Das Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Bharatpur, Post Nipania Tehsil Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara C. G.
4 - Shravan Tandon S/o Late Sukh Das Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Bharatpur Post Nipania Tehsil Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara C. G.
5 - Hiramati Tandon W/o Late Sukh Das Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Bharatpur Post Nipania Tehsil Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara C. G.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management Department Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur C. G.
VISHAKHA
BEOHAR
Digitally
signed by
VISHAKHA
BEOHAR
2 - Collector Baloda Bazar Bhatapara C. G.
3 - Sub Divisional Office Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara C.
G.
4 - Tehsildar Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara C. G.
... Respondents
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners :- Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate For State :- Mr. Hariom Rai, P.L.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 22.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to submit an appropriate representation before the competent authority.
2. In view of the prayer made, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to submit an appropriate representation before the competent authority. The competent authority, upon receipt of such representation, shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, if so required.
3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The competent authority shall decide the representation independently and in accordance with law, without being influenced by any observation made in the present order.
4. The petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid liberty and directions.
sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Vishakha