Chhattisgarh High Court

WPC/834/2021 of GHANSHYAM DAS RUNGTA FOUNDATION Vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, RAIPUR on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:41172 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 834 of 2021 1 - Ghanshyam Das Rungta Foundation Registration No. 2279, Rungta Bhawan, Ge Road, Ganjpara, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. Through- Shri Saurabh Rungta, Secretary, S/o Santosh Rungta, A /o 48, Years,

CGHC010039542021

2026:CGHC:41172

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 834 of 2021

1 - Ghanshyam Das Rungta Foundation Registration No. 2279, Rungta Bhawan, Ge Road, Ganjpara, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. Through- Shri Saurabh Rungta, Secretary, S/o Santosh Rungta, A/o 48, Years, R/o Rungta Bhawan, Ge Road, Ganjpara, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - Municipal Corporation, Raipur Through Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Zone Commissioner Office Of Municipal Corporation Raipur, Office Zone No. 8, Mohba Bazar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Asst. Revenue Officer Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Ward No. 1, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

... Respondent(s)

( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)

For Petitioner(s)

: Ms. Priyanka Bajpai appears on behalf of Mr.

S.K. Dangi, Advocate

For Respondents

: Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate

RUCHI

YADAV

Digitally

signed by

RUCHI

YADAV

SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 22/09/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard on I.A. No. 03/2026, an application seeking permission to withdraw the present petition.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the present petition any further and, therefore, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the same.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that he has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.

4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that the learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection, I.A. No. 03/2026 is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition.

5. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead