Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/751/2022 of PRAVIN KUMAR PATEL Vs SHAMMI ABIDI on 21 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41306 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 751 of 2022 1 - Pravin Kumar Patel S/o Shri Ramlal Patel Aged About 31 Years Occupation Guest Teacher (TGT/PGT Special Studies) Government Eklavya, Adarsh Avasiya Vidhyalaya, Sonakhan, Dist. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara,
CGHC010231652022
2026:CGHC:41306
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 751 of 2022
1 - Pravin Kumar Patel S/o Shri Ramlal Patel Aged About 31 Years Occupation Guest Teacher (TGT/PGT Special Studies) Government Eklavya, Adarsh Avasiya Vidhyalaya, Sonakhan, Dist. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh R/o Khari, Post Amakhoa, Tehsil Kasdol District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 2 - Vinod Kumar Satnami S/o Shri Jagannath Prasad Satnami Aged About 26 Years Occupation Guest Teacher, ( TGT/PGT English)
Government Eklavya Adarsh Avasiya Vidhyalaya, Sonakhan, Dist.
Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh R/o Village Karmandi, Post Kanasda, Tehsil Nawagarh District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Shammi Abidi Commissioner Chhattisgarh State Level Tribal Welfare, Awasiya, Evam Ashram Shaikshnik, Sansthan Samiti Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - P.C. Lahre Assistant Commissioner (Tribal Development Department)
District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh
3 - Rajat Bansal Collector Office Of The Collector, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 4 - Santosh Kumar Chouhan Principal Government Eklavya Adarsh Avasiya Vidhyalaya, Sonakhan Dist. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioners
: Mr. Chandradeep Prasad, Advocate
For Respondents
: Mr. Dheerendra Pandey, Advocate
S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 22/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court 27.06.2022 in WPS No.4735 of 2022 and other connected matters.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after the interim order was passed on 27.06.2022, a certified copy thereof was obtained on 28.06.2022 and it was handed over on the same day to the Receipt Section of the concerned department, where it was received by the Receipt Clerk. He contended that even thereafter respondents have published the select list.
3. Upon putting a query as to whether thereafter the order of appointment was issued or not, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have not specifically pleaded in this regard.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that interim order passed by High Court in WPS No.4375 of 2022 was not brought to their notice by the concerned receipt Clerk. He contended that it came to knowledge of respondents only after publication of select list and thereafter further proceedings have been stayed by them. They have not issued order of appointment to the selected candidates thereafter, status quo is being maintained with regard to recruitment proceeding as per advertisement subject matter of challenge in writ petition.
5. Considered the submissions of learned counsel for respective parties and perused the documents annexed along with this contempt petition.
6. Perusal of the document enclosed along with this contempt petition and the reply of respondents would show that though select list was issued, however, appointment order has not been issued after coming to knowledge of the order of High Court.
7. In the aforementioned facts of case, I do not find any good ground to continue any further in this contempt petition.
8. Accordingly, contempt proceeding initiated against respondents is dropped. Notice issued to respondents stands discharged.
9. Contempt Petition is closed. Sd/Sd Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen