Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4938/2022 of SANJAY YADAV Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 21 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41182 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4938 of 2022 Sanjay Yadav S/o Shri Shyam Lal Yadav Aged About 39 Years, President Nagar Panchayat Mana- Camp Tehsil- Mana- Camp, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through
CGHC010376232022
2026:CGHC:41182
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4938 of 2022
Sanjay Yadav S/o Shri Shyam Lal Yadav Aged About 39 Years, President Nagar Panchayat Mana- Camp Tehsil- Mana- Camp, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector District- Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3 - Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Mana- Camp, Tahsil Mana- Camp Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
(Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
:
None
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Government Advocate and Mr.
Aniket Verma, Advocate
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 22/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Perused the record.
2. By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs : 10.1 To issue directions to call for the entire records pertains to the case of petitioner and quash the order dated 26/07/2022. 10.2 Pass any other relief/order or direction, as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstance of the case and in the interest of justice, 10.3 Cost of the petition may be granted to the petitioner.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the State submits that this petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. He submits that the financial powers of the petitioner (President, Nagar Panchayat, Mana Camp), were suspended by the impugned order. However, by virtue of the interim order dated 18.11.2022 passed by this Court, the impugned order was stayed and further, by efflux of time, the tenure of the petitioner as President, Nagar Panchayat, Mana Camp, has already expired.
4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay