Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/2482/2026 of FABIYANUS TIGGA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 21 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41244 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2482 of 2026 1 - Fabiyanus Tigga S/o Joseph Tigga, Aged About 42 Years Occupation-Cultivator, R/o Village - Duldula, Dipatoli, Tahsil - Duldula, District Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh
CGHC010364972026
2026:CGHC:41244
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2482 of 2026
1 - Fabiyanus Tigga S/o Joseph Tigga, Aged About 42 Years Occupation-Cultivator, R/o Village - Duldula, Dipatoli, Tahsil - Duldula, District Jashpur (C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Forest Range Officer, Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.)
... Respondent
(Cause title is taken from CIS)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate
For State/Respondent
: Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 22/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This CRMP has been filed seeking restoration of CRMP No.1505 of 2026, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 22.06.2026. RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while checking the cause list, the aforesaid petition could not be marked and therefore, no one appeared at the very point of time of hearing of the case and petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. Non- appearance was not deliberate, therefore, restoration application may be allowed.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent not opposed the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties as well as reasons assigned in the application, this petition is allowed and CRMP No.1505 of 2026 is restored to its original number.
5. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed of. Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu)
JUDGE Ravi Mandavi