Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/1215/2026 of PRADEEP SONI Vs JAMUNA PRASAD SONI on 21 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41267 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1215 of 2026 1 - Pradeep Soni S/o Late Ganga Prasad Soni, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village Bandhi, P.S. Pendra, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 1) 2 - Rahul Soni S/o Pradeep Soni, Aged About
CGHC010353162026
2026:CGHC:41267
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 1215 of 2026
1 - Pradeep Soni S/o Late Ganga Prasad Soni, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village Bandhi, P.S. Pendra, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh (Defendant No.
2 - Rahul Soni S/o Pradeep Soni, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Bandhi, P.S.
Pendra, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 2)
3 - Jitendra Soni S/o Late Ganga Prasad Soni, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Girari, P.S. Pendra, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh (Defendant No.
4 - Janki Soni W/o Chhotelal Soni, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Amadand, Police Station and Tahsil Pendra, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 4)
5 - Amar Agwani S/o Ramchandra Agwani, Aged About 45 Years, R/o JyotiPur, P.S.
Gaurela, Tahsil - Pendra-Road, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 5)
... Petitioners
versus
1 - Jamuna Prasad Soni S/o Late Ganga Prasad Soni, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Ward No. 08, Near New Bus Stand, Pendra, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh 2 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector/ District Magistrate, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 6)
... Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioners
:
Mr. Hemant Gupta, Advocate.
For State
:
Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Deputy Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Order on Board
22-09-2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition, however, the observation made by the learned trial Court as well as the learned appellate Court while deciding the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC may not come on the way of final adjudication of the suit.
2. Considering the submissions made by learned learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
Judge Aadil