Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4402/2026 of VEER SIKANDAR KHUNTE (MINOR) Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 20 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40955 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4402 of 2026 1 - Veer Sikandar Khunte (Minor) S/o Sikandar Singh Khunte Aged About 14 Years Through Its Father Sikandar Singh Khunte S/o Mehettar Lal Khunte, Aged 47 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Bade Seepat, Tahsil
CGHC010331602026
2026:CGHC:40955
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4402 of 2026
1 - Veer Sikandar Khunte (Minor) S/o Sikandar Singh Khunte Aged About 14 Years Through Its Father Sikandar Singh Khunte S/o Mehettar Lal Khunte, Aged 47 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Bade Seepat, Tahsil Malkharouda, District- Sakti (C.G.)
2 - Sidhhant Lahre (Minor) S/o Kamal Kishore Lahre Aged About 14
Years Through Father Kamal Kishore Lahre S/o Puri Ram Lahre, Aged 40 Years, R/o Village Dewarghata, Tahsil Hashod, District - Sakti (C.G.)
3 - Kishnan Sharma S/o Lalit Narayan Sharma Aged About 14 Years Through Father Lalit Narayan Sharma S/o Radheshyam Sharma, Aged 50 Years, R/o Village Shivrinarayan District - Janjgir Champa (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur
(C.G.)
2 - Collector Sakti District - Sakti (C.G.)
3 - District Education Officer Sakti District - Sakti (C.G.)
4 - P.M. Shri School Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Sakti, Through Its Principal, Village Chisda, Post Pendri Via Birra, Sakti District - Sakti
(C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1, 2, 3
For Respondent No. 4
:
:
Mr. Anway Tiwari, Panel Lawyer
Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI alongwith
Ms. Shweta Rai, CGC
Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 21/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying for the following reliefs: “10.1 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction to the respondents to cancel the suspension of the petitioners and permit the petitioners to rejoin the respondent no. 4 school. 10.2 Any other consequential relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper and for which the petitioners is entitled, may also kindly be granted to the petitioners, in the interest of justice.”
2. This Court, vide order dated 03.09.2026, directed the concerned authorities to file their reply expeditiously with regard to the transfer of the petitioners to a nearby Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya (JNV).
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Commissioner, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, Regional
Office, Bhubaneswar (Odisha), has transferred the petitioners to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas situated at different places.
4. Heard.
5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that all three petitioners have been transferred to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas situated at different places, the grievance raised in the present petition no longer survives. Accordingly, the subject matter of the petition has been rendered infructuous.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Madhurima