Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3315/2021 of M/S NKBPL - JRT (JV), C/O N. K. BHOJANI, Vs SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, on 20 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40970 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3315 of 2021 1 - M/s Nkbpl - Jrt (Jv), C/o N. K. Bhojani, Jalaram Kripa, Near Saraswati Park, Kranti Nagar, Bilaspur - 495004, Chhattisgarh Through It General Power Of Attorney Holder Nimish Kumar Bhojani ...
CGHC010199032021
2026:CGHC:40970
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3315 of 2021
1 - M/s Nkbpl - Jrt (Jv), C/o N. K. Bhojani, Jalaram Kripa, Near Saraswati Park, Kranti Nagar, Bilaspur - 495004, Chhattisgarh Through It General Power Of Attorney Holder Nimish Kumar Bhojani
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Secl Headquarters, Seepat Road, Bilaspur - 495006, Chhattisgarh, District :
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh
2 - The Chief General Manager (Cmc), South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Secl Headquarters, Seepat Road - 495006, Chhattisgarh 3 - The General Manager, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Chirimiri Area, Post Office West Chirimiri, Korea - 497773, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Kshitij Sharma, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Anumeh Shrivastava, Advocate appears through video conferencing.
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
Digitally
signed by
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 21/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1) The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records pertaining to the subject contract for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court; and/or 10.2) The Hon'ble Court may further kindly be pleased to issue such writ / orders / direction quashing and setting aside the impugned e-mail communication dated 23.06.2021 passed by the respondent authorities to withhold any amount payable to the petitioner from any running contracts in their respective areas against the alleged outstanding dues of Rs. 2,54,60,204/-(Rupees Two Crores Fifty Four Lakhs Sixty Thousand Two Hundred Four only); and 10.3) The Hon'ble Court may further kindly be pleased to stay the effect and operation of the impugned e-mail communication dated 23.06.2021 passed by the respondent authorities until the pendency of the instant writ petition; and 10.4) Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner; and/or
10.5) Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition. He further submits that if exigency arises he may be granted liberty to file fresh petition in accordance with law.
3. No objection has been raised from other side.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge
Raghu Jat