Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/2448/2026 of AJAY TANDAN Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 20 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41050 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2448 of 2026 1 - Ajay Tandan S/o Rampyare Tandan (Wrongly Mentioned As Pyarelal Tandan) Aged About 21 Years R/o Churela P.S. Bhatgaon District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 2 - Rampyare S/o Bhururam Aged About 53 Years
CGHC010365542026
2026:CGHC:41050
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2448 of 2026
1 - Ajay Tandan S/o Rampyare Tandan (Wrongly Mentioned As Pyarelal Tandan) Aged About 21 Years R/o Churela P.S. Bhatgaon District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)
2 - Rampyare S/o Bhururam Aged About 53 Years R/o Churela P.S.
Bhatgaon District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- District- Magistrate District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)
2 - District Excise Officer District Sarangarh -Bilaigarh (C.G.)
3 - Superintendent Of Police Sarangarh District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh
(C.G.)
4 - Station House Officer P.S. Bhatgaon District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh
(C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title is taken from CIS)
For Petitioners
:Mr. Tapan Kumar Chandra, Advocate
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Avinash Singh, G.A.
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board
21/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the order impugned dated 23.06.2025 is appealable.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this CRMP at this stage with liberty to avail other alternate remedy available under the law.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
4. Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the documents enclosed along with this petition to the counsel for the petitioners after retaining photocopies of the same. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi