Chhattisgarh High Court

WPC/2235/2021 of MUKESH KUMAR TIWARI Vs UNION OF INDIA on 20 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:40964 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2235 of 2021 1 - Mukesh Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Shri Tuleshwar Prasad Tiwari Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Judga, Tahsil- Sakti, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ...

CGHC010123502021

2026:CGHC:40964

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 2235 of 2021

1 - Mukesh Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Shri Tuleshwar Prasad Tiwari Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Judga, Tahsil- Sakti, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - Union Of India Through Ministry Of Forest, Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, Jorbagh Road, New Delhi., District : New Delhi, Delhi 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District :

Janjgir-Champa,

Chhattisgarh

4 - Ceo Janpad Panchayat Sakti, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

... Respondents

(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Mr. Kamal Kishor Patel, Advocate For State :- Mr. Vivek Verma, G.A.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad VISHAKHA

BEOHAR

Digitally

signed by

VISHAKHA

BEOHAR

Order On Board

21.09.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

2. In view of the above submission, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead