Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/1182/2026 of PRATIBHA TIWARI Vs RITURAJ RAGHUVANSHI (D.P.I.), on 20 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41102 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1182 of 2026 1 - Pratibha Tiwari W/o Alok Tiwari Aged About 44 Years R/o (Shanti Nager) Ward No. 01, Sakri, Nager Nigam Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Rituraj Raghuvanshi (D.P.I.),
CGHC010319892026
2026:CGHC:41102
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 1182 of 2026
1 - Pratibha Tiwari W/o Alok Tiwari Aged About 44 Years R/o (Shanti Nager) Ward No. 01, Sakri, Nager Nigam Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
Versus
1 - Rituraj Raghuvanshi (D.P.I.), Director Public Education Department (Lok Shikshan Vibhag) Atal Nager Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent
For Petitioner
:
Ms. Tanusha Pathak, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Parag Kotecha, Adovcate For Respondent :
Mr. Rahul Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr.
Sabyasachi Choubey, Advocate
SB:
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD
21/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 215 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 alleging non-compliance of the order dated 15.06.2026 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 4273/2026.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 15.06.2026 subject matter of contempt, has been complied with as the representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided on 07.09.2026 and the decision on the representation is enclosed along with the covering memo.
3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, it appears that the respondent has purged with the order dated 15.06.2026 passed by this Court and therefore, I do not find any good ground to continue with the contempt petition.
4. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings initiated against the respondents is dropped. Notices issued to the respondents stands discharged.
5. Contempt petition is closed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY