Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/1347/2026 of BUDHRAM Vs DR. KAMALPREET SINGH on 20 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41044 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1347 of 2026 1 - Budhram S/o Lachindhar Aged About 61 Years Posted As Chowkidar At Kanya Ashram, Bastar, District Bastar (Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Laxmi Bai W/o Sukhnath Yadav Aged About 51 Years As Cook At
CGHC010358422026
2026:CGHC:41044
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 1347 of 2026
1 - Budhram S/o Lachindhar Aged About 61 Years Posted As Chowkidar At Kanya Ashram, Bastar, District Bastar (Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh.
2 - Smt. Laxmi Bai W/o Sukhnath Yadav Aged About 51 Years As Cook At Mata Rukhmani Balak Ashram Burdi, Tahsil Katekalyan, District Sukma,
(C.G.)
3 - Gunmati Yadav W/o Chaitu Yadav Aged About 55 Years Posted As Rasoiya At Mata Kasturba Aadiwasi Kanya Ashram, Bastar, District Bastar,
(C.G.)
... Petitioners
Versus
1 - Dr. Kamalpreet Singh Aged About 58 Years The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Mr. Rituraj Raghuvanshi Aged About 55 Years The Director Of Public Instructions, Directorate Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Mr. Baliram Baghel Aged About 61 Years District Education Officer, Bastar, District Jagdalpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s)
For Petitioners
: Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate.
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
21/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. After arguing for some time, when the Court posed a question as to why the other respondents have been arrayed as party respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a better petition.
2. In view of the above, the present CONT petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
3. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order after retaining a photocopy of the same.
/- SSd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge vaibhav