Chhattisgarh High Court
FA(MAT)/371/2024 of SMT. ANJALI @ VANDANA Vs AKSHAY KUMAR @ CHATRABHAN GAVEL on 20 September 2026
2026:CGHC:41036-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 371 of 2024 1 - Smt. Anjali @ Vandana W/o Akshay Kumar @ Chatrabhan Gavel Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Dhaskamuda, Tehsil Dharamjaigarh, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh Presently R/o Railway Colony Quarter No.
CGHC010385692024
2026:CGHC:41036-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 371 of 2024
1 - Smt. Anjali @ Vandana W/o Akshay Kumar @ Chatrabhan Gavel Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Dhaskamuda, Tehsil Dharamjaigarh, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh Presently R/o Railway Colony Quarter No. 6/1, Kirodimal Nagar, Raigarh, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
versus
1 - Akshay Kumar @ Chatrabhan Gavel S/o Premshanker Gavel Aged About 27 Years Caste - Gavel, R/o Village Arjuni, Thana And Tehsil - Sakti, District - Janjgir Champa (Present Revenue District Sakti) Chhattisgarh
... Respondent
For Appellant
:
Ms. Soni Mishra, Advocate.
For Respondent
:
Ms. Neelam Soni, Advocate.
DB: Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu&
Hon’ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant
Judgment on Board
Per Parth Prateem Sahu, J
21/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have entered into a settlement during the mediation proceedings and as per the settlement, the appellant has received a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) towards permanent alimony. Learned counsel further submits that, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the appellant does not want to press this appeal on merits.
2. In view of settlement arrived at between the parties, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Sushma Sawant) Judge Judge Nikita