Chhattisgarh High Court
FA(MAT)/383/2024 of VIVEK DAKALIYA Vs SMT. JYOTI DAKALIYA on 17 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40753-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 373 of 2024 Vivek Dakaliya S/o Late Shri Karamchand Dakaliya Aged About 32 Years Profession- Businessmen Dealing With Gold And Silver, R/o Sadar Bazar Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) --- Appellant versus Smt. Jyoti
CGHC010383912024
2026:CGHC:40753-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 373 of 2024
Vivek Dakaliya S/o Late Shri Karamchand Dakaliya Aged About 32
Years Profession- Businessmen Dealing With Gold And Silver, R/o Sadar Bazar Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)
--- Appellant
versus
Smt. Jyoti Jain W/o Vivek Dakaliya Aged About 31 Years Profession- Ca, R/o Kanhaiya Lal Chaudiya, Heeramoti Line, Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)
--- Respondent
FA(MAT) No. 383 of 2024
Vivek Dakaliya S/o Late Shri Karamchand Dakaliya Aged About 32
Years Profession - Businessmen Dealing With Gold And Silver, R/o Sadar Bazar Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
---Appellant
Versus
Smt. Jyoti Dakaliya W/o Vivek Dakaliya, Aged About 31 Years Profession- Ca, R/o Kanhaiya Lal Ji Chauradiya, Heeramoti Line, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
--- Respondent
[Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :
Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate
For Respondent
:
Mr. Sabyasachi Bhaduri, Advocate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Division Bench Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sushma Sawant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
on Board
(18.09.2026) SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these appeals.
2. In absence of any opposition, permission is granted.
3. Accordingly, both these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu)
(Sushma Sawant) Judge Judge s@if