Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/2429/2026 of OM SHANKAR PATAIL Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 17 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40866 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2429 of 2026 Om Shankar Patail S/o Johit Ram Patail Aged About 33 Years R/o House No. 92, Dipapara, Chaple, P.S. And Tahsil Kharsiya, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The
CGHC010363972026
2026:CGHC:40866
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2429 of 2026
Om Shankar Patail S/o Johit Ram Patail Aged About 33 Years R/o House No. 92, Dipapara, Chaple, P.S. And Tahsil Kharsiya, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Office, Police Of P.S.
Kharsiya, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate.
For Respondent/State :
Mr. Aman Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer.
For Objector
:
Mr. Ekansh Diwakar, Advocate on behalf of Mr.
C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate.
Hon’ble Shri Justice
Parth Prateem Sahu
Order on Board
18/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Office Reference has been registered and listed on the basis of the request letter sent by the District & Additional Sessions Judge, Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.), seeking extension of time for the proper disposal of the trial in Sessions Case No. 16/2026, State of Chhattisgarh vs. Om Shankar Patail.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that trial has been concluded on 11.09.2026 and the applicant has been convicted.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that trial has already been concluded and the judgment of conviction has been passed, nothing survives for consideration of the request letter subject matter of reference.
4. Accordingly, the present CRMP is disposed of. Sd/--/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu)
JUDGE vaibhav