Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/2434/2026 of SHABBIR HUSSAIN (IN PERSON) Vs NABI BAKSH on 17 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40865 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2434 of 2026 Shabbir Hussain (In Person) S/o Abdul Rehman Aged About 70 Years Sakin Khaparganj Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Nabi Baksh S/o Mohammed Yakub Aged About 78 Years Resident
CGHC010358562026
2026:CGHC:40865
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2434 of 2026
Shabbir Hussain (In Person) S/o Abdul Rehman Aged About 70 Years Sakin Khaparganj Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner
Versus
1 - Nabi Baksh S/o Mohammed Yakub Aged About 78 Years Resident Sakin Khaparganj Police Station City Kotwali Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
2 - Mohammed Kasim Khan S/o Mohammed Ismail Aged About 76 Years Resident Sakin Khaparganj Police Station City Kotwali Tehsil And District Bilaspur
(C.G.)
3 - Smt. Sanjana Verma W/o Sanju Verma Aged About 47 Years Through Sanju Verma S/o Navrang Lal, Both Resident Ward No. 25 Gali No. 4
Kundrubadi Kashyap Colony Police Station City Kotwali Tehsil And District Bilaspur
(C.G.)
4 - Amit Hirani S/o Sadhu Ram Hirani Aged About 70 Years Ward No. 4
Police Station City Kotwali Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Thana Prabhari City Kotwali Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shabbir Hussain (In person)
For Respondent/State : Mr. Aman Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer.
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
18/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the State submits that from the documents it appears that the complainants are Sanjana Verma and Amit Hirani and, therefore, this present petition is not maintainable.
2. After arguing for some time, the petitioner-in-person submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to the other remedy available under law, for redressal of his grievance.
3. In view of the above, the present CRMP is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
4. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order after retaining a photocopy of the same.
- Sd/- Sd- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge vaibhav