Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/272/2021 of SMT. UMA PATEL Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 17 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40748 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 272 of 2021 Smt. Uma Patel W/o Shri T. P. Patel Aged About 60 Years Occupation - Advocate, Resident Of Hig-1, Parijat Castle, Ring Road No. 2, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
CGHC010294632020
2026:CGHC:40748
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 272 of 2021
Smt. Uma Patel W/o Shri T. P. Patel Aged About 60 Years Occupation - Advocate, Resident Of Hig-1, Parijat Castle, Ring Road No. 2, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
-
Tahsildar
Sakri,
District
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
3 - Panna Lal Suryavanshi S/o Late Isar R/o Village Mathai, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
4 - Geeta Prasad Suryavanshi S/o Late Chunni Lal R/o Village Mathai, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
5 - Smt. Kanti Bai Tengwar W/o Kedarnath Tengwar D/o Late Chunni Lal Tengwar, R/o Village Mathai, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
6 - Janki Bai Suryavanshi W/o Jaggannath Suryavanshi D/o Late Chunni Lal, R/o Village Khamtarai, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
7 - Vinay Kumar Gadvaliya S/o Late Govind Prasad Gadvaliya R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
8 - Vinod Kumar S/o Late Govind Prasad R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
9 - Santosh Kumar S/o Late Govind Prasad R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil
And
District
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
10 - Sanjay Kumar S/o Late Govind Prasad R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
11 - Laxmin Bai W/o Late Shyam Babu R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
12 - Mahima D/o Late Chunni Lal R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
13 - Latel Suryavanshi S/o Late Babulal R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
14 - Naveen Suryavasnhi S/o Babu Lal R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
15 - Chandrika Suryavanshi S/o Late Anujram R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil
And
District
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
16 - Amrika Bai W/o Paduman Suryavashi R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And
District
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
17 - Anjana W/o Ramawatar R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
18 - Satish Suryavanshi S/o Gendlal Suryavanshi R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil
And
District
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
19 - Ashok Suryavanshi S/o Late Gendlal Suryavanshi R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
20 - Shakul Bai W/o Gendram R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
21 - Mongra Bai W/o Lakhan Lal R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
22 - Pushplata Parihar W/o Lakhan Lal R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
23 - Annu Kumar S/o Lakhan Lal R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
24 - Lavina Bai W/o Sukhdev Prasad R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
25 - Arvind Khare S/o Dashrath R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
26 - Chitgovind S/o Chunni Lal Suryavanshi R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil
And
District
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
27 - Rajesh Bajpai S/o Late Shri Rohini Bajpai Aged About 58 Years R/o
Harnarayan Bajpai Towers, Madhya Nagri Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
None
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer
Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 18/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Court, on 27.01.2021, granted four weeks’ time to learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects. Again, on 16.04.2026, two weeks’ time was granted to cure the defects.
2. Today, the case is again listed on defaults, and none appears on behalf of the petitioner when the case is called.
3. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for want of prosecution.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Madhurima