Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4740/2026 of SMT. SONMATI PRAJAPATI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 17 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40731 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4740 of 2026 Smt. Sonmati Prajapati W/o Ramjit Prajapati Aged About 39 Years President/ Secretary/ Salesman Of Ujala Mahila (S.H.G)- Unchdih, Running Fair Price Shop- Unchdih, Gram Panchayat- Unchdih, Janpad Panchayat
CGHC010362432026
2026:CGHC:40731
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4740 of 2026
Smt. Sonmati Prajapati W/o Ramjit Prajapati Aged About 39 Years President/ Secretary/ Salesman Of Ujala Mahila (S.H.G)- Unchdih, Running Fair Price Shop- Unchdih, Gram Panchayat- Unchdih, Janpad Panchayat Lundra, Village Gangapur, Tehsil Dhaurpur, District Surguja
(C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies, Consumer Protection Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2 - The Director Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Block 2, 3rd Floor Indravati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)
3 - The Collector District Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.)
4 - The Food Controller Collectorate Premises, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.)
5 - The Food Officer Collectorate Premises, Ambikapur, District Surguja
(C.G.)
6 - The Food Inspector Lundra, District Surguja (C.G.)
7 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Dhaurpur, District Surguja
(C.G.)
8 - Durga Mahila Swam Sahayata Samuh Village Unchdih, Block Lundra, Through Its President/ Secretary Durga Mahila Swam Sahayata Samuh, Village Unchdih, Block Lundra, District Surguja (C.G.)
... Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Sunil Tripathi, Advocate
For State
: Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 18.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has called in question the legality and validity of the impugned order dated 03.08.2026 (Annexure P-1), whereby the Fair Price Shop bearing ID No. 392007033, situated at Village Gangapur, Gram Panchayat Uchdih, Janpad Panchayat Lundra, District Surguja (C.G.), which was being operated by the petitioner, has been allotted to respondent No. 8. The petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 Issue an appropriate writ, particularly a writ in the nature of Certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 03.08.2026 (Annexure P-1), passed by respondent no. 7 whereby the fair price shop of the petitioner at Gangapur, Gram Panchayat Kuchdi, Janpad Panchayat Lundra, District Surguja, has been allotted to respondent No. 8; 10.2 Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in inviting applications and proceeding with fresh allotment of Fair Price Shop ID No. 392007033 without first passing a lawful final order cancelling the petitioner's allotment to be illegal, arbitrary and violative;
10.3
Direct
the
respondents
to restore/continue the petitioner's operation of Fair Price Shop ID No. 392007033, subject to the outcome of any proceedings initiated strictly in accordance with law; 10.4 Grant any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; and”
2. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the very same petitioner, namely, Smt. Sonmati Prajapati, Secretary of Ujala Women Self Help Group, had earlier preferred W.P.(C) No. 4677 of 2026, in respect of the same subject matter, which has already been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 17.09.2026.
3. In view of the aforesaid earlier proceedings and disposal of the said writ petition, the present petition, arising out of the same cause of action, is not maintainable. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Yogesh