Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/10/2021 of MAA SHARDA MAHILASWA SAHAYATA SAMOOH Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 17 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40761 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 10 of 2021 1 - Maa Sharda Mahilaswa Sahayata Samooh Navrangpur Through Its President Smt. Hem Kumar Patel, W/o Shri Someshwar Patel, Aged About 48 Years, Sector- Kendua (Patsendry) Block Saraipali, District Mahasamund
CGHC010291092020
2026:CGHC:40761
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 10 of 2021
1 - Maa Sharda Mahilaswa Sahayata Samooh Navrangpur Through Its President Smt. Hem Kumar Patel, W/o Shri Someshwar Patel, Aged About 48
Years, Sector- Kendua (Patsendry) Block Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The District Programme Officer, Women And Child Development Department, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 3 - Project Officer, Women And Child Development Department, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 4 - Kaveri Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh, Kena, Block Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
None
For State
:
Mr. Priyank Rathi, GA
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
18/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner, in this Writ Petition, has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“a. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or suitable direction to the respondent authorities for quashing the impugned order, dt.17/09/2020 Annexure- P/1.
b. May kindly be pleased to direct the respondents for grant of permission to supply the ready to eat diet material in the Sector Kendua, Block - Saraipali, District – Mahasamund.
c. May kindly be pleased to allow the compensation to the petitioner SwaSahayata Samoohand any other relief as the Hon'ble Court may be deemed fit and proper.
d. Cost of petition may be allowed.”
2. Learned State counsel submits that against the cancellation of the supply of ready-to-eat material, an appeal lies before the concerned District Collector, which remedy has not been availed by the petitioner. He further submits that in view of the availability of an alternative remedy under the Rules, the present petition may not be adjudicated and the petitioner may be directed to avail the remedy of appeal before the concerned authority.
3. Considering the aforesaid submission and the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal before the concerned District Collector, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition at this stage.
4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal before the concerned District Collector, in accordance with law.
Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge
Priyanka