Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3745/2021 of DEEPTI BUILDERS AND COLONIZER Vs KUMARI GRACE TOPPO on 17 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40781 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3745 of 2021 1 - Deepti Builders And Colonizer Through- It's Proprietor Smt. Parvati Banjare, W/o Shri Dhaniram Banjare, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 18, Deepti Vihar Colony, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa (C.G.),
CGHC010234142021
2026:CGHC:40781
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3745 of 2021
1 - Deepti Builders And Colonizer Through- It's Proprietor Smt. Parvati Banjare, W/o Shri Dhaniram Banjare, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 18, Deepti Vihar Colony, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa (C.G.), District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
Versus
1 - Kumari Grace Toppo D/o Late Shri Johan Toppo R/o G.A.D.H.- 24 Hasdeo Vihar Colony, Janjgir District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur, (C.G.), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
(Cause title is downloaded from CIS Periphery.)
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Counsel on behalf of Mr. Sharad Mishra, Advocate.
For State
:
Dr. Arham Siddiqui, P.L.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board
18/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have arrived at a compromise and, in view thereof, the present petition has rendered infructuous.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the said prayer.
4. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that learned counsel for the State has no objection, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge U.K. Raju