Chhattisgarh High Court
ARBA/21/2025 of Charanjeet Chhabra Vs Ramesh Kumar Chhabra on 16 September 2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ARBA No. 21 of 2025 1 - Charanjeet Chhabra S/o S/o Late Jagatram Chhabra Aged About 82 Years R/o Telipara, Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Appellant Versus 1 - Ramesh Kumar Chhabra S/o S/o Shri Omprakash Chhabra Aged About 67 Years R/o Telephone Exchange
CGHC010097432025
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ARBA No. 21 of 2025
1 - Charanjeet Chhabra S/o S/o Late Jagatram Chhabra Aged About 82
Years R/o Telipara, Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Appellant
Versus
1 - Ramesh Kumar Chhabra S/o S/o Shri Omprakash Chhabra Aged About 67 Years R/o Telephone Exchange Road, Behind Geeta Lodge, Bilaspur (C.G.)
2 - Rajesh Kumar Chhabra S/o S/o Shri Omprakash Chhabra Aged About 65 Years R/o Telephone Exchange Road, Behind Geeta Lodge, Bilaspur (C.G.)
3 - Baldev Krishna S/o S/o Shri Malikram Aged About 70 Years R/o Telipara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
4 - Subhash Chandra S/o Shri Malikram Aged About 68 Years R/o Telipara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondents
[Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :
Mr. ML Saket, Advocate
For Respondents
:
Mr. KR Nair, Advocate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Division Bench Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sushma Sawant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
on Board
(17.09.2026)
1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties and, therefore, this appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn. SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN
2. The aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the appellant is not opposed by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu)
(Sushma Sawant) Judge Judge s@if