Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/2914/2024 of JEEVAN LAL KAIVARTYA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 16 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40674 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2914 of 2024 Jeevan Lal Kaivartya S/o Heera Lal Aged About 37 Years R/o Ward No. 7, Village Bhelai, Tahsil- Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The
CGHC010185352024
2026:CGHC:40674
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 2914 of 2024
Jeevan Lal Kaivartya S/o Heera Lal Aged About 37 Years R/o Ward No.
7, Village Bhelai, Tahsil- Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District :
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh
Collector Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Superintendent Of Land Records District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Sub Division Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Tahsildar Tahsil- Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Revenue Inspector Revenue Circle Jairamnagar, Tahsil- Masturi, District :
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh
7 - Catholic Church Paraghat Through Its In-Charge And Parish Priest- Joseph Thomas S/o Late K. K. Thomas, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Catholic Church Paraghat, Post Jairamnagar, Police Station And Tahsil- Masturi, District :
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh
8 - Narendra Kumar Chouhan S/o Late Gudvant Chouhan Aged About 68 Years R/o Behind Railway Hospital Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
9 - Kirti Kumar Chouhan S/o Gudwan Chouhan Aged About 51 Years Occupation- Business, R/o Maharshi Road, Mangla, Tahsil And District
Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
10 - Smt. Vijeta Chouhan W/o Ramesh Kumar Chouhan Aged About 78
Years R/o Jairamwalji Colony, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
None
For Respondent(s) :
Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 17/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None appears nor is any representation on behalf of the petitioner even when the case was called in the second round.
2. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Madhurima