Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4718/2026 of GANPAT Vs HARIYAR @ HARIHAR SINGH on 16 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40555 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4718 of 2026 1 - Ganpat S/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 65 Years 2 - Janpat S/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 63 Years 3 - Leela Prasad S/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 60 Years 4 - Lilamber S/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 55
CGHC010347622026
2026:CGHC:40555
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4718 of 2026
1 - Ganpat S/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 65 Years 2 - Janpat S/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 63 Years 3 - Leela Prasad S/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 60 Years 4 - Lilamber S/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 55 Years 5 - Neerpati S/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 52 Years 6 - Pawan S/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 50 Years 7 - Budhwaro Wd/o Late Amar Singh Aged About 48 Years 8 - Kamal S/o Late Samaru Aged About 35 Years 9 - Mohan Singh S/o Late Gaadarai Aged About 32 Years 10 - Sohan Singh S/o Late Gaadarai Aged About 30 Years All are of Caste Kanwar, Residents Of Village Madanpur, Tahsil And District Korba (C.G.)
... Petitioners
versus
1 - Hariyar @ Harihar Singh S/o Late Heera Singh Aged About 77 Years 2 - Pyari Lal S/o Late Chandan Singh Aged About 42 Years 3 - Shyam Lal S/o Late Chandan Singh Aged About 39 Years 4 - Ram Bai D/o Late Chandan Singh Aged About 33 Years 5 - Ram Kumari D/o Late Chandan Singh Aged About 31 Years 6 - Banshilal S/o Late Chandan Singh Aged About 22 Years 7 - Sirmati Wd/o Chandan Singh Aged About 65 Years 8 - Jaggu Singh S/o Late Chandan Singh Aged About 65 Years All are of Caste Kanwar, Residents Of Village Madanpur, Tahsil And District Korba (C.G.)
9 - Commissioner, Office Of The Commissioner Bilaspur Division Bilaspur
(C.G.)
... Respondents
For Petitioners
:
Mr. S.B. Pandey, Advocate
For State
:
Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
17/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioners, in this Writ Petition, have prayed for the following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate direction to the Commissioner (respondent No. 9) to decide the case No. 130/A-06/2023-24, (202401990200188) village Madanpur, Korba (Hariyar & ors. versus Ganpat & ors.) next date is 03.08.2026, at the earliest within appropriate time. 10.2 That, Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to pass any order or issue any suitable writ of superintendence as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit under the circumstances of the case including the cost of the petition.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the second appeal is pending before the concerned Additional Collector, Korba in the matter of mutation since 2011 and, till date, it has not been decided. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners is seeking a direction from this Court to the concerned Collector to decide the matter in accordance with law.
3. Learned State counsel does not oppose the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to approach the concerned Collector within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In turn, the concerned Collector shall consider and decide the application and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge
Priyanka