Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4709/2026 of THE COLOURS GROUP DURG Vs THE COLLECTOR OF STAMPS on 16 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40553 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4709 of 2026 1 - The Colours Group Durg Through Its Partners - 1.1 - Atal Godwani S/o Late Shri Tirumal Godwani Aged About 58 Years R/o Harsh Villa, Ward No. 24, Gurunanak Nagar, Sindhi Colony Durg, Tahsil And District
CGHC010361652026
2026:CGHC:40553
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4709 of 2026
The Colours Group Durg Through Its Partners - 1.1 - Atal Godwani S/o Late Shri Tirumal Godwani Aged About 58 Years R/o Harsh Villa, Ward No. 24, Gurunanak Nagar, Sindhi Colony Durg, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.)
1.2 - Ravi Kevaltani S/o Late Shri Prabhudas Kevaltani Aged About 42 Years R/o 324, Behind Arjunda Dairy, Sindhi Colony Durg, Tahsil And District Durg
(C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - The Collector of Stamps District Registrar Office, Durg, District Durg
(C.G.)
The District Registrar Durg District Durg (C.G.)
3 - Shri Omprakash Kotwani S/o Late Radhakishan Kotwani Aged About 44
Years R/o Polsai Para, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A.
RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally
signed by
RUCHI
YADAV
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 17/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of the present petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records from the Office of Sub Registrar / Registrar relating to passing of impugned order dated 25.08.26. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside / quash the impugned order dated 25.08.26 (Annexure P-13) passed by the Registrar Durg and in turn direct the Sub Registrar to register the sale deed presented before it to be executed in favour of Smt. Archana Sharma. 10.3 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the present case including cost of the petition..”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute between the partners has already been resolved and an arbitral award has also been passed to that effect. However, the respondent/Registrar is not taking the aforesaid aspect into consideration and is not proceeding with the registration of the sale deed proposed to be executed in favour of Smt. Archana Sharma.
3. Learned State counsel submits that from the order dated 25.08.2026, it appears that the concerned Registrar has directed the petitioner to appear along with the relevant documents, whereafter the sale deed would be processed in accordance with law, subject to due verification of the documents.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the submission made on behalf of the petitioners that the dispute between the partners has already been resolved, the petitioner is directed to appear before the concerned Registrar along with all relevant documents.
6. Upon appearance of the petitioner and production of the relevant documents, the concerned Registrar shall consider the same and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law, after due verification of the documents and fulfilment of all requisite statutory formalities. If the concerned Registrar finds the documents and other requirements to be in order, the sale deed shall be processed and registered in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi