Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4256/2022 of SITA RAM SAHU Vs HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. on 16 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40615 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4256 of 2022 1 - Sita Ram Sahu S/o Late Mithal Ram Sahu Aged About 56 Years R/o Ward No. 06, Kapadah, Post - Kishungarh, P.S. Pandariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 -
CGHC010313172022
2026:CGHC:40615
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4256 of 2022
1 - Sita Ram Sahu S/o Late Mithal Ram Sahu Aged About 56 Years R/o Ward No. 06, Kapadah, Post - Kishungarh, P.S. Pandariya, District :
Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Through Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Raipur Retail Regional Office 2nd Floor, Madina Manjil, Medical College Road, Raipur, District :
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh
2 - The Collector Kabirdham, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pandariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 4 - Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Yashwant Sahu Aged About 26 Years Caste
- Teli, R/o Village - Kapadah, Tahsil Pandariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. K.P. S. Gandhi, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) No. 1
: Mr. Ali Asgar, Advocate.
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RAGHVENDRA
JAT
Digitally
signed by
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
17/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “(i) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 16.11.2021 passed by the respondent no. 3 and also to set-aside the allotment granted to the respondent no. 4 for the purpose of the commercial Petrol Pump, in the interest of justice.
(ii) Any other relief, which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is alternative remedy available to him under the law to redress his grievance. As such, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy available to him available under the law.
3. No objection has been raised from other sides.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to avail alternative remedy available to him under the law. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat