Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/1290/2026 of ABHIMANYU KUMAR MAURYA Vs DR KAMALPREET SINGH on 15 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40437 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1290 of 2026 • Abhimanyu Kumar Maurya S/o Shri S.N. Prasad Aged About 51 Years Presently Posted As Incharge Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Sulsuli, Block - Wadrafnagar, District - Balrampur
CGHC010346062026
2026:CGHC:40437
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 1290 of 2026
•
Abhimanyu Kumar Maurya S/o Shri S.N. Prasad Aged About 51 Years Presently Posted As Incharge Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Sulsuli, Block - Wadrafnagar, District - Balrampur Ramanujganj
(C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Dr Kamalpreet Singh, Secretary School And Education Department, Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh.
2. Mr. D. Rahul Venkat, Secretary Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission (C.G. P.S.C.) North Block, Sector 19, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh.
3. Shri Rituraj Raghuvanshi, Currently Posted As Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction (D.P.I.) Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
4. Shri Rajesh Singh, Joint Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, District - Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.
5. Shri Maniram Yadav, District Education Officer Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : None. Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 16/09/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this contempt petition with liberty to file better petition.
2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Chandrakant