Chhattisgarh High Court
WA/851/2026 of RAJENDRA SINGH RAJPUT Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 15 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40448-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 851 of 2026 Rajendra Singh Rajput S/o Late Shri Makarand Singh Rajput Aged About 49 Years Constable (Driver) Special Intelligence Branch / S I B Bastar R/o Mother Teresa Ward Thana Bodhghat Jagdalpur District-
CGHC010346032026
2026:CGHC:40448-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WA No. 851 of 2026
Rajendra Singh Rajput S/o Late Shri Makarand Singh Rajput Aged About 49
Years Constable (Driver) Special Intelligence Branch / S I B Bastar R/o Mother Teresa Ward Thana Bodhghat Jagdalpur District- Bastar Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Home/ Police Department Government Of Chhattisgarh Mantralaya Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh District- Raipur Chhattisgarh, 2 - Director General Of Police Police Headquarters Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Additional Director General Of Police Intelligence / Special Branch Police Headquarters Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
4 - Inspector General Of Police Bastar Range Jagdalpur District- Bastar
(C.G.)
5 - Deputy Inspector General Of Police Special Intelligence Branch Police Headquarters Raipur (C.G.)
6 - Superintendent Of Police Bastar Jagdalpur District- Bastar C.G.
7 - Superintendent Of Police Special Intelligence Branch Jagdalpur District Bastar (C.G.)
... Respondents
For Appellant
: Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate
For Respondent-State
: Mrs. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate
Division Bench
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge &
Hon’ble Smt. Sushma Sawant, Judge
Order on Board
16.09.2026
Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ appeal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings for redressal of his grievance(s).
2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, this writ appeal stands disposed of with liberty as prayed for. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Sushma Sawant) Judge Judge
Alfiza