Chhattisgarh High Court

FA(MAT)/31/2024 of RAJENDRA BORKAR Vs CHANDNI SAHU on 14 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:40323-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 31 of 2024 1 - Rajendra Borkar S/o Beniram Borkar Aged About 40 Years R/o Harsh Residency, Devpuri, House No. 22, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - Chandni Sahu W/o Rajendra Borkar, D/o Late

CGHC010024252024

2026:CGHC:40323-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

FA(MAT) No. 31 of 2024

1 - Rajendra Borkar S/o Beniram Borkar Aged About 40 Years R/o Harsh Residency, Devpuri, House No. 22, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

... Appellant

versus

1 - Chandni Sahu W/o Rajendra Borkar, D/o Late Arvind Sahu Aged About 33 Years R/o Opp. Sumit Cloth Centre Birgaon, P.S. Urla, District Raipur (C.G.)

... Respondent

(Cause title as taken from the CIS)

For Appellant

:

Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate

For Respondent

:

Mr. Vimal Pathak, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Devershi Thakur, Advocate D.B. : Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Sushma Sawant Judge

Order on Board

Per

Parth Prateem Sahu, J :

15/09/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submits that this case was referred to Mediation Centre of this Court and both the parties appeared before the Mediation Centre of this Court on

3rd September, 2026. During course of mediation, both the parties have arrived at settlement which is recorded by the mediator forming part of the record and therefore, this appeal may be disposed of in accordance with the terms of the settlement arrived between the parties in mediation proceedings.

2. We have gone through the settlement arrived between the parties and recorded by the mediator. It appears to be just and reasonable. The terms of the settlement is extracted below for ready reference : “a. That, at present both the children are with party No. 1.

b. That, the parties have amicably settled that the parties shall bear the custody of both children periodically and the children shall not be separated from each other anytime without their consent.

c. That, Party No. 2 shall keep custody of children on every Saturday, Sunday, holidays including festivals and on rest of the days the custody of children shall remain with the father with visiting rights of mother.

d. That, the children shall reside in the place/house of the party which is nearest to their school so that studies can continue without any hindrance.

e. That, both the parties shall not pressurize children against their will for residing with them and strictly not abuse the liberty by ill-treating them.

f. That, both the parties shall have the visiting rights to visit their children at the time when the other party has the custody of the child as per above mentioned terms.

g. That, in case if a child falls sick, then the parties shall immediately inform each other and further, the custody shall be preferred to the mother with a preferring visitation right to the father or vice versa with consent of both the parties.

h. That, the Parties agree to maintain cordial and respectful relations with each other and shall endeavor to maintain family harmony so that there is no adverse mental effect over the children.

i. That, both the parties shall be responsible for due care, education, health and better future of children.

j. That, both the parties shall have right to visit and meet each other at reasonable times and occasions, and the parties shall cooperate in maintaining family bond and relationship.

k. That, the parties are willing to close the litigation F.A. (MAT) 31 of 2024 pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh and Case No. 51/2023, pending before learned 1" Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur (C.G.).

l. That, the parties shall be at liberty to revise the aforesaid terms and conditions with mutual consent as and when the situation arises.”

3. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for the parties and also considering the terms and condition of the settlement arrived between the parties, we are inclined to accept the submission of both the counsel for the parties and the appeal is disposed of in terms of settlement arrived between the parties.

4. Accordingly, this appeal stands disposed of.

5. Decree be drawn accordingly.

Sd/- Sd/-

(Parth Prateem Sahu)

(Sushma Sawant) Judge

Judge

Ravi Mandavi

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead