Chhattisgarh High Court
FA(MAT)/31/2024 of RAJENDRA BORKAR Vs CHANDNI SAHU on 14 September 2026
2026:CGHC:40323-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 31 of 2024 1 - Rajendra Borkar S/o Beniram Borkar Aged About 40 Years R/o Harsh Residency, Devpuri, House No. 22, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - Chandni Sahu W/o Rajendra Borkar, D/o Late
CGHC010024252024
2026:CGHC:40323-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 31 of 2024
1 - Rajendra Borkar S/o Beniram Borkar Aged About 40 Years R/o Harsh Residency, Devpuri, House No. 22, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
... Appellant
versus
1 - Chandni Sahu W/o Rajendra Borkar, D/o Late Arvind Sahu Aged About 33 Years R/o Opp. Sumit Cloth Centre Birgaon, P.S. Urla, District Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondent
(Cause title as taken from the CIS)
For Appellant
:
Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate
For Respondent
:
Mr. Vimal Pathak, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Devershi Thakur, Advocate D.B. : Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Sushma Sawant Judge
Order on Board
Per
Parth Prateem Sahu, J :
15/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submits that this case was referred to Mediation Centre of this Court and both the parties appeared before the Mediation Centre of this Court on
3rd September, 2026. During course of mediation, both the parties have arrived at settlement which is recorded by the mediator forming part of the record and therefore, this appeal may be disposed of in accordance with the terms of the settlement arrived between the parties in mediation proceedings.
2. We have gone through the settlement arrived between the parties and recorded by the mediator. It appears to be just and reasonable. The terms of the settlement is extracted below for ready reference : “a. That, at present both the children are with party No. 1.
b. That, the parties have amicably settled that the parties shall bear the custody of both children periodically and the children shall not be separated from each other anytime without their consent.
c. That, Party No. 2 shall keep custody of children on every Saturday, Sunday, holidays including festivals and on rest of the days the custody of children shall remain with the father with visiting rights of mother.
d. That, the children shall reside in the place/house of the party which is nearest to their school so that studies can continue without any hindrance.
e. That, both the parties shall not pressurize children against their will for residing with them and strictly not abuse the liberty by ill-treating them.
f. That, both the parties shall have the visiting rights to visit their children at the time when the other party has the custody of the child as per above mentioned terms.
g. That, in case if a child falls sick, then the parties shall immediately inform each other and further, the custody shall be preferred to the mother with a preferring visitation right to the father or vice versa with consent of both the parties.
h. That, the Parties agree to maintain cordial and respectful relations with each other and shall endeavor to maintain family harmony so that there is no adverse mental effect over the children.
i. That, both the parties shall be responsible for due care, education, health and better future of children.
j. That, both the parties shall have right to visit and meet each other at reasonable times and occasions, and the parties shall cooperate in maintaining family bond and relationship.
k. That, the parties are willing to close the litigation F.A. (MAT) 31 of 2024 pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh and Case No. 51/2023, pending before learned 1" Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur (C.G.).
l. That, the parties shall be at liberty to revise the aforesaid terms and conditions with mutual consent as and when the situation arises.”
3. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for the parties and also considering the terms and condition of the settlement arrived between the parties, we are inclined to accept the submission of both the counsel for the parties and the appeal is disposed of in terms of settlement arrived between the parties.
4. Accordingly, this appeal stands disposed of.
5. Decree be drawn accordingly.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu)
(Sushma Sawant) Judge
Judge
Ravi Mandavi