Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/1219/2024 of BHAWANI BAHADUR SINGH Vs TOPESHWAR VERMA on 10 September 2026
2026:CGHC:39855 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1219 of 2024 1 - Bhawani Bahadur Singh S/o Late Shivendra Bahadur Singh Aged About 53 Years R/o Lal Niwas, Chichola Road, Thana Chowk, Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Topeshwar
CGHC010362962024
2026:CGHC:39855
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 1219 of 2024
1 - Bhawani Bahadur Singh S/o Late Shivendra Bahadur Singh Aged About 53
Years R/o Lal Niwas, Chichola Road, Thana Chowk, Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner
Versus
1 - Topeshwar Verma Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management.
2 - Basavaraju S Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Ranbir Sharma Collector, Bemetara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Manish Nigam, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1
:
Mr. Vivek Sahu, Advocate
For Respondents No. 2 & 3
:
Mr. Navoday Singh, Advocate
SB:
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD
11/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 215 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 alleging non-compliance of the order dated 10.07.2024 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 3449/2024.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 10.07.2024 subject matter of contempt, representation submitted by the petitioner has been rejected and therefore, he may be granted liberty to challenge the said decision of the respondents.
3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the parties, I do not find any good ground to continue with the contempt petition.
4. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings initiated against the respondents is dropped. Notices issued to the respondents stands discharged.
5. Contempt petition is closed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY